The Bible understands the covenant from two different angles. The unconditional or eternal covenant (Berit`olam) between Yhwh and Israel/Judah assumes that the covenant can never be broken, although it allows divine judgment. Thus, the new covenant is far superior to the old one (i.e.dem, according to Paul and according to Hebrew. This is implicitly implicit in the use of the adjective “new” in 1 Co 11:25 (cf. Luke 22:20), which clearly alludes to the negative contrast of Jeremiah (Jeremiah 31, 31-32). Paul is, however, even more picky in 2 Co 3, where he explicitly contrasts new and old alliances and emphasizes the great inferiority of the old in relation to the superior glory and constancy of the new. A similar and negative comparison is also made by its “figurative” contrast between Hagar and Sarah in Gal 4:21-31. This Alliance method emphasizes that the emphasis is on rewarding loyalty and good deeds that have already been done. Weinfeld supports his characterization of a treaty by identifying the parallels revealed by the covenant between the Lord and Israel.

In the same way, he uses the Abrahamic and Davidian Alliances to reveal his correspondence with a royal scholarship. Despite the many theories that turn alliances in the old Middle East, Weinfeld watches over his readers that the covenants revealed in the Old Testament fall under one of the two plausible types he has identified, either a mandatory type or a change of sola. 3 Moses ascended to God, and the Lord called him from the mountain to him, and said, “You will say this to the descendants of Jacob, and what you will say to the people of Israel: 4 You have seen what I have done to Egypt, and how I have carried you on the wings of the eagle, and you have brought me. (I) 5 Now, if you obey fully and have my covenant, then you of all nations will be my precious possessions. 6 You will be for me a kingdom of priests and a holy people. These are the words you will say to the Israelis. By not obeying God – by disregarding its laws – Israel violated the conditions of the Association. The Israelis simply had no desire, commitment or will to follow God`s ways and instructions. They did what is natural for humanity, is to despise God and hate His law (Romans 8:7 Romans 8:7Weiler that the carnal spirit is enmity against God, for it is not subject to God`s law, nor can it be. American King James×. The Mosaic Alliance or the Mosellan Law, which Christians, unlike the New Covenant, generally call “the Old Covenant,” played an important role in the organization of Christianity.

It was the source of serious quarrels and quarrels that could be seen in Jesus` controversy over the law during his sermon on the mountain, the controversy of circumcision in early Christianity and the antiochian incident, which led the scholar to challenge the relationship between Paul of Tarsus and Judaism.